Redflex Warns That Speeding Will Get Out of Control Without Cameras

At AZ Central today there is a short puff piece by the mouth pieces of government about the speed camera program that actually cost lives, despite what the camera apologists tell you.

There were a few things I wanted to mention about this piece. I will copy it here and insert my comments in block quotes.


Arizona shuts down speed cameras on freeways
by Dustin Gardiner - Jul. 16, 2010 12:00 AM
The Arizona Republic

Speed cameras on freeways across Arizona went dark just before midnight last night, ending the state's controversial experiment with photo enforcement.

The short-lived program expired after the state Department of Public Safety decided against renewing its contract with camera vendor Redflex Traffic Systems. Gov. Jan Brewer signaled in January that she planned to bring the cameras down.

From the beginning, photo cameras had been heavily criticized as a government money-making scheme that did not enhance public safety.

The program even incited vandalism of cameras and the fatal shooting of a Redflex technician last year.

Supporters point to studies suggesting photo enforcement reduces crashes and saves lives. And with the cameras gone, Redflex is warning that speeding will spike to dangerous levels.

"This should be a wake-up call to everyone in the community to be even more careful and watch for a large increase in aggressive, dangerous driving," said Shoba Vaitheeswaran, a spokeswoman for Redflex, which has its U.S. headquarters in Phoenix.

Of course the company that makes money off of each and every violation that takes place will say such a thing. What also isn’t said is that the speed in Arizona freeways, at least from what I saw, rarely went above 80 miles an hour, which is around where the speed limit should be when the fact that the speed limit should - given proper engineering - be set at the 85th percentile speed. The average speed drivers go on Arizona’s freeways is 75 mph, no more and no less. Therefore the speed limit should be set at around 80 mph and with Arizona’s freeway speed limits being an average of 65 mph that is against the regulations and proper engineering practices. Even the 2009 MUTCD states this about the 85th percentile! The damn government is ignoring traffic regulations while artificially keeping the speed limits low to make money!



In fact, as an example, in Utah last year they raised their speed limits to 80 mph and saw no change in the amount of accidents. And furthermore, they decriminalized the speed at which drivers were going. An interesting part of the article stated, "Engineers have determined that the greatest safety can be achieved when speed limits match the 85th percentile speed."

So, not only is Arizona making its roads less safe by keeping the speed limit low, but is also creating “criminals" out of innocent people. Despicable.

Meanwhile, critics are cheering the move as a victory for personal liberties.

Former state Rep. Sam Crump, a Republican who resigned to run for Congress, said the cameras are an abuse of technology in the hands of government and could lead to more intrusive practices.

"I can see the Obama administration putting a chip in every car and saying, 'We'll issue a ticket,' " if you break the law, he said.

If these people actually took off their blinders for one second the cameras haven’t stopped the surveillance, and I’m sure if they wanted to the government could begin using the other cameras to monitor behavior and track vehicles (which I’m sure they already do).

Cities with their own speed-camera programs, including Phoenix, Mesa, Scottsdale and Chandler, are not affected by DPS' decision.

Efforts to outlaw photo enforcement statewide through a ballot initiative have not gotten enough voter signatures or have died in the Arizona Legislature.

Damn it.

Redflex has until mid-November to remove its 78 fixed and mobile cameras from Arizona freeways. The company said it will leave the fixed cameras in place through Labor Day to gather data on speeding trends after the program's end.

Yes, and I’m sure they will inflate the speed at which drivers are going after the removal of the cameras just to make themselves appear needed. Sure, just allow a company that has a vested interest in people driving fast monitor the speed. Sure, don’t try to encourage them to lie or anything.

Crews were to begin removing signs for the cameras around midnight Thursday. The warning signs will be replaced by messages from the Arizona Department of Transportation reminding people to drive safely.

Since the cameras first popped up in September 2008, they have snapped more than 2.7 million times. Of those, only about 16 percent resulted in paid citations, generating $78 million for a fund controlled by the Legislature.

Then-Gov. Janet Napolitano, who shepherded the program before resigning to join the Obama administration last year, famously estimated the cameras would generate $90 million in their first year.

DPS officials have been ambiguous about whether they hope to revive the program sometime in the future.

I’m sure they will. The question is, when.

Two days before a top commander sent a letter to Redflex indicating the agency would let the contract expire, he sent legislators an e-mail lobbying them to support a bill giving DPS full control over the program. That bill passed.

The agency won't answer questions about its lobbying for the bill. But a future governor could bring the cameras back.

Recently appointed DPS Director Robert Halliday has said he scrapped photo enforcement because he was uncomfortable with the perception that DPS was more interested in revenue than safety.

Wow, someone at DPS who seems to have his head out of his ass.

One of Halliday's top priorities as director has been to increase the number of Highway Patrol officers, believing that troopers in marked cars, not cameras, will make Arizona's roadways safer.

However, there is no planned increase in patrol efforts to coincide with the end of photo enforcement, said Robert Bailey, a DPS spokesman. Officers will be "patrolling just like they did the day before," he said.

Bullshit. I’ve seen more cops with radar guns on the freeways than I have in years, even prior to the coming of the cameras!

I also can't ignore the side bar that was included noting the “highlights" of photo-enforcement. Let's see what they have here...

Photo-enforcement highlights

Even before freeway speed cameras went statewide, a pilot program along the Loop 101 in Scottsdale was making headlines after it snagged the likes of Earl Simmons, the rapper who performs as DMX, and Arizona Cardinals quarterback Matt Leinart. Ever since then, the cameras have been center stage in a series of bizarre and tragic stories.

September 2008: Speed cameras begin snapping photos on highways throughout the state.

Dec. 3, 2008: A man damages a photo-enforcement camera with a pickax. He is sentenced to a year of probation and forced to pay a $3,500 fine. Other vandals use Silly String and Post-it notes to cover camera lenses.

April 19, 2009: Douglas Georgianni, 51, an employee for camera vendor Redflex Traffic Systems, is shot and killed while working in a speed-camera van on the Loop 101. The man accused in his death, Thomas DeStories, 69, is awaiting trial.

August, 2009: Dave Vontesmar, 49, was served with 37 violations at work after he was accused of speeding down Valley freeways wearing a monkey mask.

April 30: Department of Public Safety sends a letter to Redflex letting the company know it will not renew its 2-year contract.

July 15: The state's contract with Redflex expired at midnight.

Yeah, sure don’t note the huge backlash that took place; the fact that these cameras contributed to accidents; and that the very company running this program was just another unethical, greedy, and irresponsible corporation.

Bottom line. “Speeding" wasn't ‘out of control’ to begin with and it won't be a problem after!